July 22, 2008

July 21, 2008

Quote

9:41 pm

[I]t is important that you not hold initial ideas too precious. For if you do, it becomes easy for all of your further trials to somehow lead back to that initial idea, no matter how inappropriate it may later be proven to be. Yet it is likely that these facts will be lost on you.

Andy Rutledge, of Design View fame, on the risk of holding too tight to first ideas. (#)

July 20, 2008

July 19, 2008

Document

11:56 pm

No Joke

The reviews for Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight have been pretty darn good. I’m becoming more and more skeptical of reviews, but when Salon’s comics expert Douglas Wolk goes and points out, in total comic geek terms, what this movie could have been, I find it much harder to be completely in love.

Keep reading. // Leave a comment.

July 18, 2008

Quote

10:13 am

A snowclone is a particular kind of cliche, popularly originated by Geoff Pullum. The name comes from Dr. Pullum’s much-maligned “If Eskimos have N words for snow, X surely have Y words for Z.” An easier example might be ”X is the new Y.” The short definition of this neologism might be n. fill-in-the-blank headline

Erin O'Connor, keeper of snowclones.org. I love the concept. Jeremy Keith has suggested an especially good one.. (#)

July 17, 2008

Quote

11:10 am

Imaginary work is always easier to do than real work. It is much more attractive (being more quickly done) and once you see the imaginary work, it can be very difficult to identify the real work it masks. People estimating imaginary work often assume they have all the facts in hand when making their estimates, which assumption leads them to believe that there is no “big technical hurdle” preventing its implementation.

Jamis Buck, programmer for 37signals, on the public's tendency to underestimate the time and effort required to develop even the "simplest" features (via Gruber). (#)

July 16, 2008

Quote

3:45 pm

Apple, through its marketing and visual design techniques, is manufacturing an illusion that merely buying an Apple makes you part of an alternative community. But the technology they use is explicitly chosen to divide people into separate digital cells, and to position Apple as sole warden. When your business depends on people paying for the privilege of being locked up, the prison better look and feel luxurious, and the bars better not be too visible.

The Free Software Foundation, commenting on the precedent Apple is setting by walling off software development for the iPhone. Can't say I disagree (via Lifehacker). (#)

July 15, 2008

July 14, 2008

July 13, 2008

I don’t care to talk about the piece of the iPhone 2.0 launch that Apple botched. What I am interested in are the little gems Apple have added to an already brilliant device. Sure, native apps are great. But for me, the real news is that Apple has left almost all of the iPhone’s UI and core functionality untouched, opting instead to implement a handful of fixes and incremental improvements to the 1.x series software.

Keep reading. // Leave a comment.